IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrn/journl/y2014i1p65-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Foundations of the Assessment of Internal Audit

Author

Listed:
  • Plamena Nedyalkova

    (Varna University of Economics)

Abstract

The assessment of internal audit in the public sector has always been a fundamental issue, since on the basis of the assessment process there are identified many of its distinctive features, such as: quality, efficiency, effectiveness, economy, reliability, etc. In the controlling practice there exist different assessment models, which, due to their specific character, are very often applied incorrectly. For that reason, the aim of the present article is to present systematically the distinctive features of the established methods of assessment of internal audit. The article is of a theoretical orientation towards the variation of the control methods for assessing the quality of the internal audit in the organizations from the public and the non-public /private/ sector. Through induction, deduction and the comparative approach as research methods, the aim is to fulfil the main task of the article, namely to make a comparison between assessment methods. The absence of a piece of practical and applied research work is one reason for limiting the scope of the article and not verifying in detail the purpose of the respective method of determining the quality of internal audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Plamena Nedyalkova, 2014. "Methodological Foundations of the Assessment of Internal Audit," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 65-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:65-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.ue-varna.bg/uploads/20150330110641_132825738355192e414930c.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:65-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yana Doneva (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.