IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrn/journl/y2013i3p38-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmaceutical Markets: Public and Private Roles and Failures

Author

Listed:
  • Stefka Koeva

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the specific character of pharmaceutical markets from the point of view of participating parties or “players” and the failures those suffer, in view of the efficiency of the market outcome. The proposition which is defended is that it is not only the private markets and the stakeholders participating in them, who are at times unable to ensure the efficient allocation of resources (as demonstrated successfully by standard economic theory), but also that the regulating centre, the state, too, is responsible for a series of failures and defects, which are typical of the pharmaceutical sector. The two kinds of markets, private and political, as well as their failures must be measured impartially and there must be sought the best combination in choosing a suitable policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefka Koeva, 2013. "Pharmaceutical Markets: Public and Private Roles and Failures," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 3, pages 38-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:38-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.ue-varna.bg/uploads/20150220080922_114670155954e6ebb23fcda.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pharmaceutical markets; market failures; political failures; interested parties;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2013:i:3:p:38-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yana Doneva (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.