IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v66y2019i3p365-383id849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Instability, Economic Inequality and Social Conflict: The Case in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Marzia Ippolito
  • Lorenzo Cicatiello

Abstract

Rising economic inequality may produce a contraction of political stability and a spread of social conflict, as suggested by the theory of relative power. Following this approach, participation in the political arena depends on the distribution of incomes, because the relative rich use their power to ensure that the status quo do not change, while the relative poor are likely to abandon the public arena when they realize that their demands will not be discussed. Through the implementation of an index of political stability on the Italian general elections of 2008 and 2013, this study empirically tests whether political instability is linked with economic inequality. The results of the analysis, which examines the sub-regional level, show that the strengthening of economic inequality is a decisive factor affecting the weight of the elites in the determination of economic and political choices, and that it influences the distribution of votes between political blocks. This comes at the disadvantage of the poorest who, aware of their lesser chances to have influence, choose to change the character of their participation. Key words: Political participation, Social conflict, Relative power theory. JEL: D31, D72. Politička nestabilnost, ekonomska nejednakost i socijalni sukob: slučaj u Italiji Rastuća ekonomska nejednakost može proizvesti kontrakciju političke stabilnosti i širenje društvenih sukoba, kao što to sugeriše teorija relativne moći. Prateći ovaj pristup, učešće u političkoj sceni zavisi od raspodele prihoda, jer relativno bogati koriste svoju moć da osiguraju da se status quo ne promeni, dok će relativno siromašni verovatno napustiti javnu scenu kada shvate da se o njihovim zahtevima neće raspravljati. Kroz implementaciju indeksa političke stabilnosti na opštim izborima u Italiji 2008. i 2013. godine, ovaj rad empirijski testira da li je politička nestabilnost povezana sa ekonomskom nejednakošću. Rezultati analize, koja razmatra subregionalni nivo, pokazuju da je jačanje ekonomske nejednakosti odlučujući faktor koji utiče na ulogu elite u određivanju ekonomskih i političkih izbora, i da utiče na distribuciju glasova između političkih blokova. To je nepovoljno za najsiromašnije koji, svesni da imaju manju šansu da imaju uticaj, odlučuju da promene karakter svog učešća. Ključne reči: Politička participacija, društveni konflikt, teorija relativne moći.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzia Ippolito & Lorenzo Cicatiello, 2019. "Political Instability, Economic Inequality and Social Conflict: The Case in Italy," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 66(3), pages 365-383.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:3:p:365-383:id:849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/849/544
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ippolito, Marzia & Cozzolino, Adriano & Ercolano, Salvatore, 2024. "If you really love nothing. Evaluating second-order factors in the case of Italian constitutional referendum of 2020," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political participation; Social conflict; Relative power theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:3:p:365-383:id:849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.