IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v0y0i0p1-27id1856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of Quasi-Experimental Approaches to the Analysis of the Relationship Between Employment and Health

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Kaneva

Abstract

This study is the first to use quasi-experimental approaches to analyze the employment–health relationship in Russia. We employ propensity score matching to assess the impact on self-reported health of being employed or unemployed during the period 2010-2018. Using a difference-in-differences estimator, we also explore the effect of re-employment on physical health. Controlling for selection bias, we find a negative impact of unemployment on physical health. We also confirm that being employed leads to better self-reported health than being unemployed. Part of the effect is related to improved individual mental health. Furthermore, the difference-in-differences estimator of the re-employment effect shows that finding a job after three years of not working increases self-reported health. The results have important policy implications. The government should actively promote employment and initiate information campaigns to promote free health checkups for the unemployed. In Russia, where the state bears the cost of healthcare, these policies will eventually allow the government to save money on medical treatment. JEL: C21, I10, I12.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Kaneva, 0. "The Application of Quasi-Experimental Approaches to the Analysis of the Relationship Between Employment and Health," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 0(0), pages 1-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:0:y:0:i:0:p:1-27:id:1856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/1856/861
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unemployment ; Selection effect ; Propensity score matching ; Difference-in-differences estimator ; Russia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:0:y:0:i:0:p:1-27:id:1856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.