IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v97y2021i2p436-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Discounting of Forest Offsets in the Carbon Market

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin R. Kaushal
  • Knut Einar Rosendahl

Abstract

Unilateral actions to reduce CO2 emissions can be costly and may lead to carbon leakage through relocation of emission-intensive and trade-exposed industries (EITE). This article examines the welfare effects of introducing an emission offset mechanism for the EITE sector, where EITE producers may have to acquire more than one offset credit to balance one emission allowance. The analytical results suggest that it is globally welfare improving for a region to introduce such an offset mechanism, with an optimal conversion rate below 1. Moreover, numerical simulations in the context of the European Union emission trading system and the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) credits support the analytical findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin R. Kaushal & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2021. "Optimal Discounting of Forest Offsets in the Carbon Market," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 97(2), pages 436-454.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:436-454
    Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.97.2.436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/97/2/436
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:436-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.