IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v72y1996i1p56-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Costs in Privately Owned and Publicly Owned Electric Utilities: The Role of Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Soo Koh
  • Sanford V. Berg
  • Lawrence W. Kenny

Abstract

The continued coexistence of small, publicly owned electricity utilities and larger privately owned utilities suggests that each ownership form has advantages inherent in scale and/or the acquisition of inputs. This pattern may be due to voters being better monitors in small jurisdictions, which yields more effective municipal cost control. This empirical study analyzes, using a translog cost function, the relative cost-efficiency of a relatively large sample of 121 privately owned and 61 publicly owned firms generating electricity via fossil fuels. Publicly owned firms are indeed more efficient at low output levels. Ownership choices are consistent with cost minimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Soo Koh & Sanford V. Berg & Lawrence W. Kenny, 1996. "A Comparison of Costs in Privately Owned and Publicly Owned Electric Utilities: The Role of Scale," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 72(1), pages 56-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:72:y:1996:i:1:p:56-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147157
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heesun Jang, 2021. "Firm structure, scale economies, and productivity in the U.S. electric power industry: A cost function analysis," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(5), pages 834-854, August.
    2. John Kwoka, 2006. "The Role of Competition in Natural Monopoly: Costs, Public Ownership, and Regulation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 29(1), pages 127-147, September.
    3. John E. Kwoka, 2005. "The comparative advantage of public ownership: evidence from U.S. electric utilities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 622-640, May.
    4. Ramos-Real, Francisco Javier, 2005. "Cost functions and the electric utility industry. A contribution to the debate on deregulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 69-87, January.
    5. See, Kok Fong & Coelli, Tim, 2014. "Total factor productivity analysis of a single vertically integrated electricity utility in Malaysia using a Törnqvist index method," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 62-72.
    6. See, Kok Fong & Coelli, Tim, 2012. "An analysis of factors that influence the technical efficiency of Malaysian thermal power plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 677-685.
    7. Banker, Rajiv D. & Chang, Hsihui & Cunningham, Reba, 2003. "The public accounting industry production function," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 255-281, June.
    8. Jr. Ozuna & Irma Adriana Gomez, 1998. "Regulation, Organization and Incentives: The Political Economy of Potable Water Services in Mexico," Research Department Publications 3025, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    9. Abdul Ghafoor & Rizwana John Weiss, 1999. "Privatisation of Electric Power Sector in Pakistan: Some Important Issues," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 69-84.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:72:y:1996:i:1:p:56-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.