IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v6y1971i1p103-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocation of Resources to Health

Author

Listed:
  • Charles T. Stewart Jr.

Abstract

A fourfold classification of resources devoted to health is employed: treatment, prevention, information, and research. The typical relation between treatment and prevention is competitive, whereas that between information and research is complementary, as is the relation between the two pairs of subsystems. The four subsystems also differ in scale effects and in their temporal and spatial characteristics, affecting allocative choice between them. Using life expectancy as the dependent variable, an attempt was made to measure the significance of treatment variables, literacy (proxy for information), and potable water (proxy for prevention) for all nations in the Western Hemisphere. Both literacy and potable water proved highly significant, whereas none of the treatment variables were significantly related to life expectancy. Data from the United States also suggest a low marginal productivity of medical treatment in terms of life expectancy. Alternative explanations are discussed, together with indicated reallocation of resources away from medical treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles T. Stewart Jr., 1971. "Allocation of Resources to Health," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 6(1), pages 103-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:6:y:1971:i:1:p:103-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/144876
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hauß, Friedrich, 1983. "Arbeitsbelastungen und ihre Thematisierung im Betrieb," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 112249, September.
    2. Peter Zweifel & Lukas Steinmann & Patrick Eugster, 2005. "The Sisyphus Syndrome in Health Revisited," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 127-145, June.
    3. James W. Shaw & William C. Horrace & Ronald J. Vogel, 2002. "The Productivity of Pharmaceuticals in Improving Health: An Analysis of the OECD Health Data," HEW 0206001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 May 2003.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:6:y:1971:i:1:p:103-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.