IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v16y1981i4p523-548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Controlled Experiment: Treating the Mentally Ill

Author

Listed:
  • Burton A. Weisbrod

Abstract

This study is the first benefit-cost analysis of a controlled (random assignment) experiment in the mental health field. It compares, in terms of an unusually wide variety of "tangible" and "intangible" forms of benefits and costs, a traditional hospital-based approach to treating the mentally ill with a nontraditional community-based approach. The study highlights the very different forms taken by the effects of the alternative therapies. Thus it shows how distorted conclusions can result from a failure of benefit-cost analyses to measure benefits and costs comprehensively; a change in form can be mistaken for a change in level of costs or benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Burton A. Weisbrod, 1981. "Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Controlled Experiment: Treating the Mentally Ill," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 16(4), pages 523-548.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:16:y:1981:i:4:p:523-548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145235
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. M. A. A. Evers & A. S. Van Wijk & A. J. H. A. Ament, 1997. "Economic Evaluation of Mental Health Care Interventions. A Review," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 161-177, March.
    2. Aidan R. Vining & David L. Weimer, 2013. "An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit–cost analysis to social policy," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 1, pages 25-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Richard O. Zerbe, 1998. "Is cost-benefit analysis legal? Three rules," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 419-456.
    4. John Geweke & Burton A. Weisbrod, 1984. "How Does Technological Change Affect Health Care Expenditures?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 75-92, February.
    5. Ejaz Gul & Imran Sharif Chaudhry, 2014. "Qualitative Assessment of Energy Initiative: Case Study from Liberia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(3), pages 360-372.
    6. Debra Sabatini Dwyer & Olivia S. Mitchell & Robert Cole & Sylvia K. Reed, 1995. "Evaluating Mental Health Capitation Treatment: Lessons from Panel Data," NBER Working Papers 5297, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Machnes, Yaffa, 1996. "Incentives and production of mental health services," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 459-466, November.
    8. Joseph Nicolette & Stephanie Burr & Mark Rockel, 2013. "A Practical Approach for Demonstrating Environmental Sustainability and Stewardship through a Net Ecosystem Service Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:16:y:1981:i:4:p:523-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.