IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v15y2024i5p2-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective well-being indices in assessing happiness in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Lyudmila S. Skachkova

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Olga Ya. Gerasimova

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Darya D. Krivosheeva-Medyantseva

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

Abstract

Due to the multidimensionality and dynamism of today’s social life, there emerges the need to modify the principles of measuring the effectiveness of socio-economic policy. The article empirically tests and analyzes subjective metrics focused on “failures” in the socio-economic development which are impossible to identify through objective indicators only. These metrics are the subjective well-being indices for the Russian population in terms of gender and age, residence (by federal districts), level of education, marital status, presence of children, subjective health assessments, job and pay satisfaction. The methodological framework resides in Edward Diener’s subjective well-being theory. The method of index numbers and methods of descriptive statistics, including the multivariate frequency distribution of two attributes, are applied. The evidence base is comprised of panel data of The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey – Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) for 2013–2022. According to the research results, the minimum and maximum values of the life satisfaction index were observed in 2016 and 2022, respectively. The affective index of happiness was found to reach higher values compared to the cognitive assessment of it. The findings show that gender, age, region of residence, level of education, as well as satisfaction with health, job, wage and financial status affect the values and dynamics of happiness indices in Russia. A well-being measurement approach covering both objective and sub jective assessments of people’s life and its individual aspects allows identifying gaps in the system of socio-economic support for the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyudmila S. Skachkova & Olga Ya. Gerasimova & Darya D. Krivosheeva-Medyantseva, 2024. "Subjective well-being indices in assessing happiness in Russia," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 15(5), pages 2-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:5:p:2-21
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-5-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/111/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2024/1706
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-5-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public administration; subjective well-being; socio-economic development; happiness; life satisfaction; job satisfaction; wage satisfaction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:5:p:2-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.