IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v15y2024i2p31-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University absorptive capacity: Normative and perceived assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana V. Orekhova

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • O.M. Nikitina

    (Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Knowledge management in universities is a dual process combining continuous learning and development of academic staff with the simultaneous transfer of knowledge to students. Collective capabilities and motivation of university employees to absorb and effectively apply knowledge underlie the so-called university absorptive capacity. However, characteristics perceived by workers and the level of absorptive capacity may contrast with the assessments based on university performance standards. The paper proposes and tests a dual method for judging on university absorptive capacity based on normative and perceived assessments. Methodologically, the study rests on knowledge management, the fundamental theoretical framework that covers the concept of absorptive capacity of an organization. Among the research methods are comparative analysis of university performance indicators and economic statistics. Empirical evidence includes data from the survey of 187 academic staff members of Ural Federal University (Ekaterinburg, Russia) and the Monitoring of Efficiency of Higher Educational Institutions in the RF in 2022–2023. Having performed content analysis, we identified the following evaluation parameters: the current level of employees’ knowledge and the potential for knowledge absorption in the organization. The first part of the methodology presents an algorithm for comparing the growth rates of normative performance indicators of the university in question with those of analogous universities. The second part deals with assessing absorptive capacity based on academic staff’s perceptions. The testing results indicate that there is a discrepancy between the normative and perceived assessments, which allowed us to propose a set of measures for adjusting the HR management model in a university.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana V. Orekhova & O.M. Nikitina & Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich, 2024. "University absorptive capacity: Normative and perceived assessments," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 31-47, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:31-47
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/108/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2024/1555
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. V. Orekhova & O. M. Nikitina, 2023. "Internal university labor market: problem, inevitability or expediency?," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 9(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      knowledge management; absorptive capacity; university; higher education; academic staff; work motivation; perceived assessments; normative assessments;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:31-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.