IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/urb/journl/v3y2016p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results of Renzi’s Government economic policy after 2 years

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano Di Pace

    (Professore straordinario di Politica economica all’Università Guglielmo Marconi di Roma)

Abstract

“- austerity = + economic growth†equation has been the focus of Renzi’s Government economic policy, as stated in the Italian Stability Program 2014. This research proves that Italy did not experience such trade-off in the short term. Furthermore, as mainstream literature had demonstrated, as to the negative correlation between high public debt and economic growth, this investigation has collected evidence that the growth of public debt, in absolute terms and in relationship with Gdp, has been accompanied in Italy by economic stagnation. Moreover, data show that this situation is, in the European framework, a phenomenon nearly exclusively specific to Italy.r to expenditure decisions. The recent overhauling of the appraisal for public investment enacted in Italy is consistent with this goal. The paper briefly discusses strengths and weaknesses of the new framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano Di Pace, 2016. "Results of Renzi’s Government economic policy after 2 years," Argomenti, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics, vol. 3(3), pages 1-17, January-A.
  • Handle: RePEc:urb:journl:v:3:y:2016:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.14276/1971-8357.507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.uniurb.it/RePEc/urb/journl/507-2031-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14276/1971-8357.507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    austerity; economic growth; economic policy; economic performance; government assessment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H60 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - General
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:urb:journl:v:3:y:2016:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carmela Nicoletti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deurbit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.