Author
Listed:
- Rinat GATAULLIN
(Federal State Institution of Science Institute of Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa Science FGBUN ISEI)
- Almir Askarov
- Gulnara Huzhahmetova
(Federal State Institution of Science Institute of Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa Science FGBUN ISEI)
- Nikita Yarkov
(Federal State Institution of Science Institute of Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa Science FGBUN ISEI)
Abstract
The multistructurality and variety of organizational and economic forms of business pattern in agriculture are reasonably related and presented in the form of the individual and private, collective, state, and also mixed business. The individual and private type of small rural business is country farms and those personal farms, which have commodity or partially commodity character. Collective business in agro-industrial sector of the Republic of Bashkortostan is conducted on the basis of collective-share and cooperative property. All republic agricultural organizations belong to cattle breeding, cattle breeding grain, and grain cattle breeding types, at various combinations of other industries, traditional for the republic as additional. The cattle breeding of milk and meat direction is characterized for all zones of the Republic. Different organizational and economic forms of enterprises have various level of efficiency. The existing experience confirms higher efficiency of large-scale enterprises in comparison to small-scale that is determined by the economic law of production concentration (density, scale), that is economy of scale. There are also distinctions in indicators of farm efficiency. The purpose of the work is the proposal development on creation of the effective agriculture support mechanism. In preparing the study, the methods of statistical data analysis, material analysis of reports of some farms for 2006-2013, also their inspections, indicators of budget performance of the Republic, SWOT analysis of the institutional potential assessment of the internal and external factors influencing the agro-industrial complex strategy development are used. Scope of the results: system of state regulation and support of agro-industrial complex taking into account the business patterns existing in agriculture. Conclusions and main results of the analysis: 1. At the present time, various ways in agriculture, at the right choice of specialization are not competitive to each other, therefore, have the equal rights for the state support. 2. The choice of business pattern has to be carried out by each site of agricultural production independently, at own risk. 3. Structurization of functions of various level public authorities and municipal self-government in regulation of agricultural production is required.
Suggested Citation
Rinat GATAULLIN & Almir Askarov & Gulnara Huzhahmetova & Nikita Yarkov, 2015.
"Organizational and Economic Forms and Effective Methods of State Regulation of Agriculture,"
Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 271-284.
Handle:
RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:271-284
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Denis Samygin, 2017.
"Design Model for the Development of Agrarian Economy: Food Aspect,"
Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 591-603.
- Yuri A. Kolesnikov & Tatiana V. Epifanova & Anastasia M. Usenko & Ekaterina Parshina & Victoria N. Ostrovskaya, 2016.
"The Peculiarities of State Regulation of Innovation Activities of Enterprises in the Global Economy,"
Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 10(4), December.
- R. R. Galiev & H. D. Ahrens, 2018.
"Part-Time Farmers in Russia: Phenomenon and Social Functions Based on the Example of the Republic of Bashkortostan,"
Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 257-266, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:271-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.