IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unt/jnapdj/v14y2007i2p107-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voluntary carbon trading: potential for community forestry projects in India

Author

Listed:
  • Rohit Jindal

    (Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies, Michigan State University, United States)

  • John Kerr

    (Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies, Michigan State University)

  • Shailesh Nagar

    (Freelance consultant based in New Delhi)

Abstract

Voluntary carbon markets, such as the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), were worth $90 million in 2006. This paper finds that community forestry interventions of three organizations in India are eligible to sell carbon sequestration credits on CCX. Their combined annual sequestration potential is 104,427 tons of carbon dioxide (tCO2), worth $417,708 at 2007 prices. Although this value will be difficult to realize immediately, it indicates the potential for carbon sequestration to raise rural incomes in India. These benefits can be actualized by first linking small pilot projects with CCX and then scaling up operations. Projects will also need to reduce transaction costs to raise the shares of carbon revenue that farmers receive. The diversion of land to raise tree crops needs to be balanced with food security concerns. A potentially viable approach would be to take up carbon plantations on common lands with concerned agencies acting as a liaison between farmer groups and the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohit Jindal & John Kerr & Shailesh Nagar, 2007. "Voluntary carbon trading: potential for community forestry projects in India," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 14(2), pages 107-126, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:14:y:2007:i:2:p:107-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/apdj-14-2-5-JindalKerrNagar.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krey, Matthias, 2004. "Transaction costs of CDM projects in India: An empirical survey," HWWA Reports 238, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    2. Krey, Matthias, 2004. "Transaction Costs of CDM Projects in India - An Empirical Survey," Report Series 26112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lokesh Chandra Dube & Sudipto Chatterjee, 2022. "Assessing livelihood impact of forest carbon projects using sustainable livelihood framework," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Jindal, Rohit & Kerr, John M. & Carter, Sarah, 2012. "Reducing Poverty Through Carbon Forestry? Impacts of the N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 2123-2135.
    3. Ashish Aggarwal, 2014. "How sustainable are forestry clean development mechanism projects?—A review of the selected projects from India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 73-91, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce P. Chadwick, 2006. "Transaction costs and the clean development mechanism," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(4), pages 256-271, November.
    2. repec:ags:aare05:139304 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oscar Cacho & Leslie Lipper, 2006. "Abatement and Transaction Costs of Carbon-Sink Projects Involving Smallholders," Working Papers 06-13, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    4. Khem Raj Dahal & Shiva Ch & ra Dhakal, "undated". "The Relative Efficiency of Organic Farming in Nepal," Working papers 105, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    5. Axel Michaelowa, 2007. "Unilateral CDM—can developing countries finance generation of greenhouse gas emission credits on their own?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 17-34, March.
    6. Betz, Regina, 2006. "Emissions trading to combat climate change: The impact of scheme design on transaction costs," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 174096, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Mundaca, Luis & Mansoz, Mathilde & Neij, Lena & Timilsina, Govinda R, 2013. "Transaction costs of low-carbon technologies and policies : the diverging literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6565, The World Bank.
    8. Cacho, Oscar J. & Lipper, Leslie, 2007. "Abatement and Transaction Costs of Carbon-Sink Projects Involving Smallholders," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 9324, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. U. Kalpagam & Karimullah, 2007. "India's Business Prospects in the Global Emissions Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 237-250, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India; CDM; Carbon markets; Community forestry; Chicago; Climate Exchange;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:14:y:2007:i:2:p:107-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division, ESCAP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.