IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unc/tncjou/42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The intersection of public procurement law and policy, and international investment law

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic Npoanlari Dagbanja

Abstract

There is substantial scholarship on the limitations that international investment agreements (IIAs) place on States’ authority to regulate in the public interest. An area of fundamental importance that has not received scholarly attention in connection with IIAs is public procurement regulation. Given that public procurement is about the needs of States and their citizens, States would want to retain their authority within municipal public procurement laws to decide with whom to contract to meet those needs, and to pursue socioeconomic and industrial policies through procurement. However, most States are parties to IIAs, which impose obligations on them with respect to the protection of foreign investment. This article explores this seminal issue of whether IIAs stand to limit the authority of States in the implementation of procurement legislation and policies. Based on textual analysis and arbitral case study, it argues that treaty-based standards of investment protection can limit States’ authority on the implementation of methods of procurement (such as national competitive tendering or restricted tendering) and socioeconomic policies in procurement. A question that needs fuller engagement is the extent of conflict between specific IIAs and public procurement laws and policies, either regionally or globally, and how to reconcile conflicting obligations to promote foreign investment and sustainable development. This article provides the foundation for such future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic Npoanlari Dagbanja, . "The intersection of public procurement law and policy, and international investment law," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:unc:tncjou:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaeia2020d2a3_en.pdf?repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneiderman,David, 2008. "Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521692038.
    2. Salacuse, Jeswald W., 2010. "The Law of Investment Treaties," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199206056.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cross Ciaran & Schliemann-Radbruch Christian, 2013. "When Investment Arbitration Curbs Domestic Regulatory Space: Consistent Solutions through Amicus Curiae Submissions by Regional Organisations," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 67-110, September.
    2. Jordan Brennan, 2013. "The Power Underpinnings, and Some Distributional Consequences, of Trade and Investment Liberalisation in Canada," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 715-747, October.
    3. Diana Carolina Bernal Pérez, 2018. "El derecho internacional de inversión extranjera y la industria extractiva. estándares internacionales en el sector extractivo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1057, October.
    4. Thrasher Rachel D. & Gallagher Kevin P., 2015. "Mission Creep The Emerging Role of International Investment Agreements in Sovereign Debt Restructuring," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 257-285, December.
    5. Ishikawa Tomoko, 2014. "Collective Action Clauses in Sovereign Bond Contracts and Investment Treaty Arbitration – An Approach to Reconcile the Irreconcilable," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 63-98, July.
    6. Lauge N. Skovgaard Poulsen & Emma Aisbett, 2011. "When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning," Crawford School Research Papers 1105, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    7. Anna Herranz-Surrallés, 2020. "‘Authority Shifts’ in Global Governance: Intersecting Politicizations and the Reform of Investor–State Arbitration," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 336-347.
    8. Kevin P. Gallagher, 2010. "Policy Space to Prevent and Mitigate Financial Crises in Trade and Investment Agreements," G-24 Discussion Papers 58, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    9. Brennan, Jordan, 2013. "The Power Underpinnings, and Some Distributional Consequences, of Trade and Investment Liberalisation in Canada (Preprint)," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(5), pages 715-747.
    10. Kevin P. Gallagher, 2011. "Losing Control: Policy Space to Prevent and Mitigate Financial Crises in Trade and Investment Agreements," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 29(4), pages 387-413, July.
    11. Cote, Christine, 2018. "A chilling effect? Are international investment agreements hindering government’s regulatory autonomy?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108406, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Diaby-Pentzlin, Friederike, 2020. "Deficiencies of international investment law: What chances for "critical lawyers" to civilize global value chains and/or to transform the status quo of the economic world order?," Wismar Discussion Papers 04/2020, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    13. Robert G. Finbow, 2016. "Restructuring the State through Economic and Trade Agreements: The Case of Investment Disputes Resolution," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 62-76.
    14. Patricia Ranald, 2015. "The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Reaching behind the border, challenging democracy," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 241-260, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unc:tncjou:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kumi Endo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unctach.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.