IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ulp/buopee/v37y2017m12i4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les critères d’allocation du Fonds de Cohésion sont-ils respectés ?

Author

Listed:
  • Benoît Dicharry

    (Université de Strasbourg (BETA))

  • Phu Nguyen-Van

    (CNRS & Université de Strasbourg (BETA).)

  • Thi Kim Cuong Pham

    (Université de Strasbourg (BETA))

Abstract

Cette note se focalise sur les fonds structurels mis à disposition de la politique régionale de l’UE, et plus particulièrement sur le Fonds de Cohésion qui a la particularité de n’être destiné qu’aux pays les plus pauvres de l’UE. Nous allons chercher à vérifier si l’allocation actuelle du Fonds de Cohésion entre ses différents pays receveurs permet de répondre totalement au défi de la convergence économique affichée dans les traités européens.

Suggested Citation

  • Benoît Dicharry & Phu Nguyen-Van & Thi Kim Cuong Pham, 2017. "Les critères d’allocation du Fonds de Cohésion sont-ils respectés ?," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 37(1), pages 25-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:37:y:2017:m:12:i:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opee.unistra.fr/Les-criteres-d-allocation-du-Fonds-de-Cohesion-sont-ils-respectes
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:37:y:2017:m:12:i:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opstrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.