IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/journl/v10y2018i1p8-14id9373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community empowerment in rural infrastructure development program

Author

Listed:
  • Waridin Waridin
  • Atika Dzulkhijiana
  • Izza Mafruhah

Abstract

This study evaluates the role of stakeholders in the Rural Infrastructure Develop-ment Program (RIDP) and analyzes the intensity of community participation in the program implementation with a willingness to pay. Also, it analyzes the factors that influence community empowerment. This research uses sequential mixed method with descriptive statistics, Context Input-Output and Outcome Process (CIPOO), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Willingness to Pay (WTP). The results of the analysis show that the main actors in the community empowerment program are the community followed by the local government, academician, and business actors. The community WTP is IDR 5,100, which helps them to maintain sustainability and maintain projects built by the government actively. The empowerment process is the most important factor followed by context and input as the second priority, while output and outcome become the third priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Waridin Waridin & Atika Dzulkhijiana & Izza Mafruhah, 2018. "Community empowerment in rural infrastructure development program," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(1), pages 8-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:uii:journl:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:8-14:id:9373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/article/view/9373/8069
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leo Fatra Nugraha & Lies Sulistyowati & Iwan Setiawan & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Alternative Community-Based Village Development Strategies in Indonesia: Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:journl:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:8-14:id:9373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.