IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jekife/v3y2017i2p81-89id10756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisis perbandingan manajemen laba dengan metode Discretionary Accrual pada bank syariah dan bank konvensional

Author

Listed:
  • Galuh Tri Pambekti

Abstract

Earnings management is a deliberate act by managers using their power to determine the policy of regulating the level of corporate earnings. The purpose of this study is to prove that there is a difference between the level of earnings management in Islamic banks and conventional banks. The sample of this research are Islamic banks and conventional banks registered in Bank Indonesia for 2011-2015 The sample used is 96 samples. The testing technique in this study used independent mean test (Independent Sample T-Test). The earning management variables in this study were measured by discretionary accrual, measurement using Modified Jones Model (1991) to calculate total accruals. The results showed that the value of Sig. (2-tailed) is 0,000 indicates that there is a difference between Group A and Group B. It means that there is a difference between discretionary accrual ratio of conventional bank and discretionary accrual ratio of Islamic banks, it can be said there are differences in earnings management between Conventional Bank and Islamic Bank.

Suggested Citation

  • Galuh Tri Pambekti, 2017. "Analisis perbandingan manajemen laba dengan metode Discretionary Accrual pada bank syariah dan bank konvensional," Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 3(2), pages 81-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:3:y:2017:i:2:p:81-89:id:10756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/article/view/10756/8761
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:3:y:2017:i:2:p:81-89:id:10756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.