IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jekife/v11y2025i1p131-142id35213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mudharabah, musyarakah, financing risk, and performance of Islamic banks: Empirical evidence from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Radhita Asfarina Annizar
  • Eddy Junarsin

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines the effects and thresholds of mudharabah and musyarakah on the financing risk and performance of Indonesian Islamic banks. Methodology – Using panel data and quadratic regression analysis, we explore the nonlinear relationships among mudharabah, musyarakah, financing risk, and performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia using a sample of 14 Indonesian Islamic banks during the period to 2008-2020.Findings – We find that mudharabah is negatively related to financing risk and positively (in the initial stage) linked to Islamic bank performance. Mudharabah will reduce financing risk if the proportion of mudharabah to total loans is in the range of 5.5-12.6%. A proportion of mudharabah below 5.5% or above 12.6% worsens non-performing financing (NFP), loan loss provision (LLP), and Z-score. In contrast, musyarakah is found to be positively (although marginally) related to financing risk and negatively and weakly associated with the performance of Indonesian Islamic banks. Implications – Our findings have consequential implications for both practitioners and policymakers. Understanding the dual effects of mudharabah and musyarakah can help to implement strategies that optimize investment portfolios, enhance profitability, and minimize risk. For policymakers, these results highlight the need for regulatory frameworks that encourage optimum thresholds of mudharabah financing to mitigate risk while spurring performance. Originality – This study contributes to the literature by identifying a turning point in mudharabah financing that minimizes financing risk, a realm previously underexplored in Islamic finance. By incorporating this nuanced insight, our study provides a novel perspective on how Islamic banks can attain strategic equilibrium between risk management and performance improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Radhita Asfarina Annizar & Eddy Junarsin, 2025. "Mudharabah, musyarakah, financing risk, and performance of Islamic banks: Empirical evidence from Indonesia," Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 11(1), pages 131-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:131-142:id:35213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/article/view/35213
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samir Belkhaoui & Naif Alsagr & Stefan F. van Hemmen & Mohammed M. Elgammal, 2020. "Financing modes, risk, efficiency and profitability in Islamic banks: Modeling for the GCC countries," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1750258-175, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saba Iqbal & Safia Nosheen, 2023. "Moderating impact of non-performing loans on the relationship between sustainable development goals and the financial performance of banks," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Silvia, Ani & Viverita, V. & Chalid, Dony Abdul, 2024. "The effects of formal institutions and national culture on equity-based financing in Islamic banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Muhammad Rabiu Danlami & Muhamad Abduh & Lutfi Abdul Razak, 2022. "CAMELS, risk-sharing financing, institutional quality and stability of Islamic banks: evidence from 6 OIC countries," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(8), pages 1155-1175, June.
    4. Jamshid ur Rehman & Khalid Hussain & Ishfaq Ahmed & Abdul Latif & Roman Ullah, 2024. "Nexus between Corporate Governance and Bank ‘Risks: Insight from the Commercial Banks in Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 877-883.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:131-142:id:35213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.