IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ufb/rpaper/v2y2016i1p57-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisitando o Debate Sobre o Cálculo Econômico: Breve Exploração da Pista Epistemológica

Author

Listed:
  • Mateus Bernardino de Souza

    (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbone)

Abstract

The paper revisits the debate on the economic calculation from an epistemological and institutional perspective. The critiques against Mises’s theory are classified into two categories: trivial and non-trivial solutions. They are presented and systematically compared. The aim is to contribute to explicit the difference between the dominant paradigm in economics represented by the market socialism solutions and the Austrian school of economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateus Bernardino de Souza, 2016. "Revisitando o Debate Sobre o Cálculo Econômico: Breve Exploração da Pista Epistemológica," REOESTE - Revista de Economia do Centro-Oeste, Nepec - Curso de Ciencias Economicas da Universidade Federal de Goias - FACE, vol. 2(1), pages 57-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:ufb:rpaper:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:57-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.revistas.ufg.br/reoeste/article/view/42531
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic calculation; Mises; Austrian school; neoclassical school;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • P50 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ufb:rpaper:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:57-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sandro E. Monsueto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecufgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.