IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/udc/esteco/v44y2017i1p33-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Zoning in Spatial Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid Hamoudi
  • Isabel Rodríguez
  • Marcos Sanz Martín-Bustamante

Abstract

This study analyzes optimal zoning policy in a duopolistic spatial competition framework for both circular and linear spaces. A regulator is introduced in the third stage of the price-location game through a welfare function to model zoning preferences from firms and consumers. An equilibrium outcome is then found for both spatial configurations. When the regulator is inclined to favor consumers (consumer-oriented) both firms are restricted to locate at one point to serve the whole market. Nevertheless, when the preferences of the regulator are biased towards firms (firm-oriented) the zoning area is maximized, with both firms being located at the market boundaries. The equilibrium outcome confirms location patterns found in real life situations under a non-neutral regulator.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid Hamoudi & Isabel Rodríguez & Marcos Sanz Martín-Bustamante, 2017. "Optimal Zoning in Spatial Differentiation," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 44(1 Year 20), pages 33-51, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:44:y:2017:i:1:p:33-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://estudiosdeeconomia.uchile.cl/index.php/EDE/article/viewFile/45213/47923
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1987. "Understanding Rent Dissipation: On the Use of Game Theory in Industrial Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(2), pages 176-183, May.
    2. de Frutos, M. A. & Hamoudi, H. & Jarque, X., 1999. "Equilibrium existence in the circle model with linear quadratic transport cost," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 605-615, September.
    3. Masahisa Fujita & Jacques-François Thisse, 1986. "Spatial Competition with a Land Market: Hotelling and Von Thunen Unified," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 53(5), pages 819-841.
    4. Hamid Hamoudi & Marta Risueño, 2012. "The Effects Of Zoning In Spatial Competition," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 361-374, May.
    5. Anderson, Simon, 1987. "Spatial competition and price leadership," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 369-398.
    6. Mark Armstrong & Simon Cowan & John Vickers, 1994. "Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262510790, April.
    7. Chen, Chin-Sheng & Lai, Fu-Chuan, 2008. "Location choice and optimal zoning under Cournot competition," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 119-126, March.
    8. Toshihiro Matsumura & Noriaki Matsushima, 2012. "Locating Outside A Linear City Can Benefit Consumers," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 420-432, August.
    9. Gupta, Barnali, 1992. "Sequential entry and deterrence with competitive spatial price discrimination," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 487-490, April.
    10. David E. Mills, 1989. "Is Zoning a Negative-Sum Game?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 65(1), pages 1-12.
    11. Pal, Debashis, 1998. "Does Cournot competition yield spatial agglomeration?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 49-53, July.
    12. Neven, Damien J., 1987. "Endogenous sequential entry in a spatial model," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 419-434.
    13. Jyh-Fa Tsai & Shin-Kun Peng & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2006. "Spatial duopoly with zoning," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(3), pages 515-530, August.
    14. Miceli, Thomas J., 1992. "Optimal fiscal zoning when the local government is a discriminating monopolist," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 579-596, November.
    15. Wrede, Matthias, 2015. "A continuous logit hotelling model with endogenous locations of consumers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 81-83.
    16. Pu-Yan Nie, 2013. "Innovation Under Spatial Duopoly," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(4), pages 474-486.
    17. Henderson, J. Vernon, 1991. "Optimal regulation of land development through price and fiscal controls," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 64-82, July.
    18. Pu-yan Nie, 2014. "Effects of capacity constraints on mixed duopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 283-294, July.
    19. Lai, Fu-Chuan & Tsai, Jyh-Fa, 2004. "Duopoly locations and optimal zoning in a small open city," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 614-626, May.
    20. Hamid Hamoudi & Isabel Mª Rodríguez Iglesias & Marcos Sanz Martín-Bustamante, 2015. "The equivalence of convex and concave transport cost in a circular spatial model with and without zoning," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 42(1 Year 20), pages 5-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz & F. Javier Casado-Izaga, 2020. "Partial ownership of local firms and zoning of neighboring towns," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(1), pages 27-43, August.
    2. Shuxiao Sun & Xiaona Zheng & Huaqing Hu & Tao Huang, 2023. "Spatial competition and social welfare considering different feasible location regions," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 17-50, January.
    3. Juan Bárcena Ruiz & F. Casado-Izaga & Hamid Hamoudi, 2014. "Optimal zoning of a mixed duopoly," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 52(1), pages 141-153, January.
    4. Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz & Francisco Javier Casado-Izaga, 2014. "Zoning Under Spatial Price Discrimination," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 659-665, April.
    5. Lai, Fu-Chuan & Tsai, Jyh-Fa, 2004. "Duopoly locations and optimal zoning in a small open city," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 614-626, May.
    6. Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz & F. Javier Casado-Izaga, 2017. "Zoning A Cross-Border City," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 173-189, January.
      • Bárcena Ruiz, Juan Carlos & Casado Izaga, Francisco Javier, 2015. "Zoning a cross-border city," IKERLANAK info:eu-repo/grantAgreeme, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.
    7. John S. Heywood & Zheng Wang, 2016. "Strategic delegation under spatial price discrimination," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95, pages 193-213, March.
    8. Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz & F. Javier Casado-Izaga & Hamid Hamoudi & Isabel Rodriguez, 2016. "Optimal zoning in the unconstrained Hotelling game," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 427-435, June.
    9. Hang Cao & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2023. "Optimal zoning of managerial duopoly," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 58-67, January.
    10. Jorge Fernández-Ruiz, 2020. "Mixed duopoly in a Hotelling framework with cubic transportation costs," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 133-149, August.
    11. Chia-Hung Sun & Jyh-Fa Tsai & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2017. "Spatial Cournot Competition in a Circular City with More than Two Dispatches," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 413-442, December.
    12. Hamid Hamoudi & María J. Moral, 2017. "Green zoning regulation under price discrimination," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 35(1), pages 151-171.
    13. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro, 2014. "Strategic delegation in two-sided markets," FEP Working Papers 536, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    14. Fleckinger, Pierre & Lafay, Thierry, 2010. "Product flexibility and price competition in Hotelling's duopoly," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 61-68, July.
    15. Georg Götz, 2002. "Spatial Competition, Sequential Entry, and Technology choice," Vienna Economics Papers 0215, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    16. Chia-Hung Sun, 2014. "Spatial Cournot Competition in a Linear City with Directional Delivery Constraints," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 65(3), pages 344-374, September.
    17. Gotz, Georg, 2005. "Endogenous sequential entry in a spatial model revisited," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(3-4), pages 249-261, April.
    18. Javier Elizalde & Markus Kinateder & Ignacio Rodríguez-Carreño, 2015. "Entry regulation, firm’s behaviour and social welfare," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 13-31, August.
    19. Chia-Hung Sun & Jyh-Fa Tsai & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2017. "Spatial Cournot competition in a circular city with more than two dispatches," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 68(4), pages 413-442, December.
    20. Devin Bunten, 2017. "Is the Rent Too High? Aggregate Implications of Local Land-Use Regulation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-064, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Zoning; spatial competition; welfare function; equilibrium results; industrial policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:44:y:2017:i:1:p:33-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Verónica Kunze (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.