IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/tpolec/doi10.1086-730055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of EITC Correspondence Audits on Low-Income Earners

Author

Listed:
  • John Guyton
  • Kara Leibel
  • Day Manoli
  • Ankur Patel
  • Mark Payne
  • Brenda Schafer

Abstract

This paper studies the impacts of Internal Revenue Service Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) correspondence (mail) audits on taxpayer behaviors. Risk-based audit selection presents a challenge for estimating behavioral effects, but this is addressed by exploiting some quasi-randomness in aspects of the audit selection process to approximate a randomized controlled trial. The analysis documents widespread disallowance of EITC benefits due to nonresponse and insufficient response. Relative to similar nonaudited taxpayers, audited taxpayers over the years after being audited are less likely to claim EITC benefits and file tax returns, and qualifying children claimed on their returns are more likely to be claimed by other taxpayers. Audited taxpayers also appear less likely to have third-party and self-reported wages, with larger decreases for self-reported wages and for wage levels in the maximum EITC benefit region.

Suggested Citation

  • John Guyton & Kara Leibel & Day Manoli & Ankur Patel & Mark Payne & Brenda Schafer, 2024. "The Effects of EITC Correspondence Audits on Low-Income Earners," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 163-207.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/730055
    DOI: 10.1086/730055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730055
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730055
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/730055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/730055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/TPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.