IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/tpolec/doi10.1086-730051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Disparities in the Income Tax Treatment of Marriage

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Holtzblatt
  • Swati Joshi
  • Nora Cahill
  • William Gale

Abstract

Although it is generally blind with respect to race, the federal individual income tax can create racial disparities when factors that affect tax liability are associated with race. We provide new evidence on racial differences in marriage penalties and bonuses in the income tax, using data from eight waves of the Survey of Consumer Finances. Our results support Brown’s hypothesis that, controlling for income, penalties are more frequent and larger for Black couples than White couples. We link these results to racial differences in relative spousal earnings, the presence of dependents, and the level of income. We show that marriage rates are much higher among White adults than Black adults, which implies that two policy reforms we examine end up benefiting a greater share of White adults than Black adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Holtzblatt & Swati Joshi & Nora Cahill & William Gale, 2024. "Racial Disparities in the Income Tax Treatment of Marriage," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 25-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/730051
    DOI: 10.1086/730051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730051
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730051
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/730051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/730051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/TPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.