IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/renvpo/doi10.1086-715582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating and Evaluating the Labyrinth of Environmental Regulation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie J. Karplus
  • Junjie Zhang
  • Jinhua Zhao

Abstract

We examine the development of China’s environmental regulatory system over nearly 50 years and review economic studies of its effectiveness. China’s environmental regulation system has evolved over time into a complex and multilayered labyrinth. However, studies in the economics literature tend to focus on a few policies that span periods for which data are available and that allow causal identification. While the literature suggests that the policies have been generally effective in improving environmental quality, it also reveals several challenges for conducting empirical analyses: a firm’s regulatory status is frequently endogenous, data quality is variable, although improving over time, and overlapping policies may undermine traditional identification approaches. Further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of China’s environmental regulations, identify the interactions of multiple policies, and extend the analyses beyond water and air to also include soil and other types of pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie J. Karplus & Junjie Zhang & Jinhua Zhao, 2021. "Navigating and Evaluating the Labyrinth of Environmental Regulation in China," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(2), pages 300-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/715582
    DOI: 10.1086/715582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715582
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715582
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/715582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/715582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/REEP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.