IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/nattax/doi10.1086-733522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Survey and Administrative Measures of Self-employment Income: New Implications from the Health and Retirement Study

Author

Listed:
  • Joelle Abramowitz

Abstract

An ample literature has found that self-employment income is underidentified in both administrative earnings records and major household surveys, potentially limiting accurate inference for tax policy. This paper uses a different survey, the 2004–2016 Health and Retirement Study, which is linked to administrative earnings records and identifies substantially more self-employment income in the survey at the extensive and intensive margins, in line with the Internal Revenue Service’s estimated compliance rate. These findings highlight (1) the capacity for survey data to identify self-employment income otherwise missed in analyses using only administrative records and (2) heterogeneity in reporting self-employment income across surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Joelle Abramowitz, 2025. "Comparing Survey and Administrative Measures of Self-employment Income: New Implications from the Health and Retirement Study," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 87-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/733522
    DOI: 10.1086/733522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733522
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733522
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/733522?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:nattax:doi:10.1086/733522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/NTJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.