IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/v41y1998i1p209-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragmentation versus Consolidation of Securities Trading: Evidence from the Operation of Rule 19c-3

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Jeffry L
  • Lightfoot, Lois E

Abstract

Stock exchanges defend their rules requiring members to trade listed stocks on an exchange floor as a means of achieving consolidation of trading, which, it is argued, minimizes trading costs to investors. By virtue of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Rule 19c-3, however, these exchange rules cannot apply to stocks newly listed after April 26, 1979. The objective of the Securities and Exchange Commission rule was to end what was viewed as restraint of desirable competition that would more than compensate for any cost saving resulting from consolidation. By comparing the cost of trading (measured by bid-ask spreads and returns variance) for the two distinct groups of stocks--those listed before April 26, 1979, and those listed after- -we test these competing views. We find that Rule 19c-3 has not caused any reduction in spreads but may have caused an increase and has had no effect on returns variance. Copyright 1998 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Jeffry L & Lightfoot, Lois E, 1998. "Fragmentation versus Consolidation of Securities Trading: Evidence from the Operation of Rule 19c-3," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 209-238, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:41:y:1998:i:1:p:209-38
    DOI: 10.1086/467389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467389
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/467389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benston, George J. & Hagerman, Robert L., 1974. "Determinants of bid-asked spreads in the over-the-counter market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 353-364, December.
    2. Garman, Mark B & Klass, Michael J, 1980. "On the Estimation of Security Price Volatilities from Historical Data," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(1), pages 67-78, January.
    3. Tinic, Seha M. & West, Richard R., 1972. "Competition and the Pricing of Dealer Service in the Over-the-Counter Stock Market," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1707-1727, June.
    4. Seha M. Tinic, 1972. "The Economics of Liquidity Services," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 86(1), pages 79-93.
    5. Stoll, Hans R, 1978. "The Supply of Dealer Services in Securities Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1133-1151, September.
    6. Cohen, Kalman J & Conroy, Robert M, 1990. "An Empirical Study of the Effect of Rule 19c-3," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(1), pages 277-305, April.
    7. Harold Demsetz, 1968. "The Cost of Transacting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(1), pages 33-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tse, Yiuman & Xiang, Ju, 2005. "Market quality and price discovery: Introduction of the E-mini energy futures," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 164-179, December.
    2. Boehmer, Beatrice & Boehmer, Ekkehart, 2003. "Trading your neighbor's ETFs: Competition or fragmentation?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1667-1703, September.
    3. Kam, Tai-Kong & Panchapagesan, Venkatesh & Weaver, Daniel G., 2003. "Competition among markets: The repeal of Rule 390," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1711-1736, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajina, Aymen & Habib, Aymen, 2017. "Examining the relationship between earning management and market liquidity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1164-1172.
    2. Lucy Lim, 2016. "Dual-class versus single-class firms: information asymmetry," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 763-791, May.
    3. Ghassan Omet, 2011. "Stock Market Liquidity: Comparative Analysis of The Abu Dhabi Stock Exchange and Dubai Financial Market," Working Papers 655, Economic Research Forum, revised 12 Jan 2011.
    4. Flannery, Mark J. & Kwan, Simon H. & Nimalendran, M., 2004. "Market evidence on the opaqueness of banking firms' assets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 419-460, March.
    5. Blau, Benjamin M., 2018. "Does religiosity affect liquidity in financial markets?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 72-83.
    6. Gibson, Scott & Singh, Rajdeep & Yerramilli, Vijay, 2003. "The effect of decimalization on the components of the bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 121-148, April.
    7. M. Frömmel & F Van Gysegem, 2014. "Bid-Ask Spread Components on the Foreign Exchange Market: Quantifying the Risk Component," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 14/878, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Kee H. Chung & Xin Zhao, 2004. "Making a Market with Spreads and Depths," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7‐8), pages 1069-1097, September.
    9. Mazza, Paolo & Petitjean, Mikael, 2016. "On the usefulness of intraday price ranges to gauge liquidity in cap-based portfolios," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 67-81.
    10. Aouadi, Amal & Arouri, Mohamed & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Information demand and stock market liquidity: International evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 194-202.
    11. Hatch, Brian C. & Johnson, Shane A., 2002. "The impact of specialist firm acquisitions on market quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 139-167, October.
    12. Pham, Son D. & Marshall, Ben R. & Nguyen, Nhut H. & Visaltanachoti, Nuttawat, 2021. "The liquidity of active ETFs," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    13. Pronk, M., 2002. "Market liquidity around earnings announcements," Other publications TiSEM 3e22cd8d-f7eb-4c28-9275-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Paresh Kumar Narayan & Sagarika Mishra & Seema Narayan, 2015. "New empirical evidence on the bid-ask spread," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(42), pages 4484-4500, September.
    15. Fleming, Michael J, 2002. "Are Larger Treasury Issues More Liquid? Evidence from Bill Reopenings," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(3), pages 707-735, August.
    16. Kothare, Meeta, 1997. "The effects of equity issues on ownership structure and stock liquidity: A comparison of rights and public offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 131-148, January.
    17. Araújo, Gustavo Silva & Barbedo, Claudio Henrique da S. & Vicente, José Valentim M., 2014. "The adverse selection cost component of the spread of Brazilian stocks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 21-41.
    18. Jieun Lee & Doojin Ryu & Ali M. Kutan, 2016. "Monetary Policy Announcements, Communication, and Stock Market Liquidity," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 227-250, September.
    19. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Rubalcava, Arturo, 2005. "International trade-venue clienteles and order-flow competitiveness," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 86-113, January.
    20. Cheng Guo & Jinwu Gao, 2017. "Optimal dealer pricing under transaction uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 657-665, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:41:y:1998:i:1:p:209-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.