IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-728855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Socially Responsible Firms Walk the Talk?

Author

Listed:
  • Aneesh Raghunandan
  • Shiva Rajgopal

Abstract

Some firms claim to be socially responsible. We confront these claims with data based on the most notable recent proclamation, the Business Roundtable’s 2019 “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation.” The influential Business Roundtable contains many of America’s largest firms; the statement proclaimed a corporation’s purpose as delivering value to all stakeholders, rather than only shareholders. However, we find no evidence that signatories—who voluntarily signed—engaged in such stakeholder-centric practices before or after signing. Relative to peers, signatories violate environmental and labor laws more frequently, have higher carbon emissions, rely more on government subsidies, and are more likely to disagree with proxy recommendations on shareholders’ proposals. We also do not observe postsigning improvements along these dimensions, which suggests that the statement was not a credible commitment to improve. Our results suggest that firms’ proclamations of stakeholder-centric behavior are not backed up by hard data.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneesh Raghunandan & Shiva Rajgopal, 2024. "Do Socially Responsible Firms Walk the Talk?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(4), pages 767-810.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/728855
    DOI: 10.1086/728855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/728855
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/728855
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/728855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/728855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.