IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-728089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Differential Impact of Legal Origins on Firm Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Yohannes Ayele
  • Habtamu Edjigu
  • Remco H. Oostendorp

Abstract

This paper examines the differential impact of legal origins on the distribution of firm-level total factor productivity (TFP) using a novel grouped-quantile treatment model with group-level unobservable characteristics. Using firm-level data across 51 countries from the World Bank Enterprise Survey, we find that firm-level TFP is higher on average in countries with common-law systems, especially in low-income countries. This impact is not uniform across the TFP distribution, with stronger impacts among high-productivity firms. Given the relatively low levels of international competitiveness among firms in low-income countries, this finding has important implications for their capability to break into export markets and create high-quality jobs. For the possible mechanisms of how legal origins affect firms’ TFP, we find that common-law countries have lower business obstacles as reflected in more favorable legal rules and regulations for access to finance, less corruption, less crime, less informality, and better tax administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yohannes Ayele & Habtamu Edjigu & Remco H. Oostendorp, 2024. "The Differential Impact of Legal Origins on Firm Productivity," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(3), pages 611-638.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/728089
    DOI: 10.1086/728089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/728089
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/728089
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/728089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/728089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.