IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-727444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bringing Dead Capital to Life: Property Rights Security in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Cheng
  • Kishore Gawande

Abstract

China’s 2007 Property Law provides a rare large-scale quasi experiment to examine the impact of restoring property rights protections for privately owned assets. We test hypotheses about property rights insecurity using novel firm-level administrative data that cover the universe of Chinese firms from 1998 to 2012. We find evidence confirming the counterfactual to de Soto’s “dead” capital, wherein the law increased new privately owned firms and enabled more firms to survive the early years and produce more; the converse to be true for state-owned enterprises, which indicates the law’s role—indeed, intent—to reallocate; and evidence of capital reallocation in the birth of more productive firms, specifically firms that became exporters.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Cheng & Kishore Gawande, 2024. "Bringing Dead Capital to Life: Property Rights Security in China," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(2), pages 265-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/727444
    DOI: 10.1086/727444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727444
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727444
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/727444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/727444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.