IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-721910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Paying with Cards Reduce Crime at Stores? Evidence from a Targeted Cash Ban in Uruguay

Author

Listed:
  • Néstor Gandelman
  • Ignacio Munyo
  • Emanuel Schertz

Abstract

We estimate the effect of cash usage on crime by exploiting a change in law in the Uruguayan capital that banned cash payments in gas stations at night. We use georeferenced crime data that allow for precise measurement of crime rates in radii around gas stations and radii around shops and other areas that were not included in the cash ban. The cash ban caused a decline of 25 percent or more in robberies in the treated areas. The effect is not observed for robberies near gas stations during daytime hours when the ban was not in effect or for crimes not motivated by cash, such as domestic violence. We find no evidence that robberies were displaced to other times or areas. Repeating our study aggregating to the neighborhood attenuates the causal effect, which may explain the lower estimates from less precise data in previous literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Néstor Gandelman & Ignacio Munyo & Emanuel Schertz, 2023. "Does Paying with Cards Reduce Crime at Stores? Evidence from a Targeted Cash Ban in Uruguay," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(1), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/721910
    DOI: 10.1086/721910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721910
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721910
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/721910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/721910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.