IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/doi10.1086-666724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where Are Limited Liability Companies Formed? An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Dammann
  • Matthias Schündeln

Abstract

We empirically study formation-state choices of limited liability companies (LLCs). Most firms in our large sample of almost 20,000 LLCs are formed in the state where their principal place of business is located. As their size increases, firms become more likely to be formed outside that state, with Delaware emerging as the primary destination for LLCs that are not formed in the state of the principal place of business. We demonstrate that substantive law matters when LLCs choose their formation state. Limited liability companies are less likely to incorporate locally if their home state offers lax norms for minority-investor protection or creditor-friendly rules for veil piercing. In addition to contributing to the debate on regulatory competition in the law, this paper has implications for theoretical debates pertaining to choice of law in veil-piercing cases, the role of default rules, and the relationship between corporations and LLCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Dammann & Matthias Schündeln, 2012. "Where Are Limited Liability Companies Formed? An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(4), pages 741-791.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/666724
    DOI: 10.1086/666724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/666724
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/666724
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/666724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Kahan, 2006. "The Demand for Corporate Law: Statutory Flexibility, Judicial Quality, or Takeover Protection?," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 340-365, October.
    2. Henry Hansmann, 2006. "Corporation and Contract," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19.
    3. Lucian Bebchuk & Alma Cohen & Allen Ferrell, 2002. "Does the Evidence Favor State Competition in Corporate Law?," NBER Working Papers 9380, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Romano, Roberta, 1985. "Law as a Product: Some Pieces of the Incorporation Puzzle," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 225-283, Fall.
    5. Jens Dammann & Matthias Schündeln, 2011. "The Incorporation Choices of Privately Held Corporations," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 79-112.
    6. Bebchuk, Lucian Arye & Cohen, Alma, 2003. "Firms' Decisions Where to Incorporate," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 383-425, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaqi Qin & Yan Sun, 2023. "Unveil the veil of limited liability: Evidence from firm investment," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 485-511, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oren Bar-Gill & Michal Barzuza & Lucian Bebchuk, 2006. "The Market for Corporate Law," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 162(1), pages 134-160, March.
    2. Brian Broughman & Jesse M. Fried & Darian Ibrahim, 2014. "Delaware Law as Lingua Franca: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(4), pages 865-895.
    3. Goergen, Marc & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "Contractual corporate governance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 166-182, June.
    4. Bebchuk, Lucian Arye & Cohen, Alma, 2003. "Firms' Decisions Where to Incorporate," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 383-425, October.
    5. Lucian A. Bebchuk & Michael S. Weisbach, 2012. "The State of Corporate Governance Research," Springer Books, in: Sabri Boubaker & Bang Dang Nguyen & Duc Khuong Nguyen (ed.), Corporate Governance, edition 127, pages 325-346, Springer.
    6. Anne Anderson & Jill Brown & Parveen P. Gupta, 2017. "Jurisdictional competition for corporate charters and firm value: a reexamination of the Delaware effect," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 341-356, November.
    7. Matthew D. Cain & Steven M. Davidoff, 2012. "Delaware's Competitive Reach," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 92-128, March.
    8. Sattar A. Mansi & William F. Maxwell & John K. Wald, 2009. "Creditor Protection Laws and the Cost of Debt," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(4), pages 701-717, November.
    9. Jagannathan, Murali & Pritchard, A.C., 2017. "Do Delaware CEOs get fired?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 85-101.
    10. Stefano Colonnello & Christoph Herpfer, 2021. "Do Courts Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from the US Court System," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(2), pages 403-438.
    11. Bhagat, Sanjai & Bolton, Brian & Lu, Jun, 2015. "Size, leverage, and risk-taking of financial institutions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 520-537.
    12. Fernando Gómez Pomar & Isabel Sáez Lacave, 2006. "Competition, Inefficiencies, and Dominance in Corporate Law. Comment," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 162(1), pages 161-167, March.
    13. Cumming, Douglas & Dai, Na & Johan, Sofia, 2015. "Are hedge funds registered in Delaware different?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 232-246.
    14. Roberta Romano, 2005. "Is Regulatory Competition a Problem or Irrelevant for Corporate Governance?," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2601, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Jan 2006.
    15. Cumming, Douglas J. & Johan, Sofia Atiqah & Reardon, Robert S., 2021. "Governance and success in U.S. equity crowdfunding," CFS Working Paper Series 668, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    16. McCahery, J.A. & Vermeulen, E.P.M., 2004. "The changing landscape of EU company law," Discussion Paper 2004, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    17. John Armour & Bernard Black & Brian Cheffins, 2012. "Is Delaware Losing its Cases?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 605-656, December.
    18. Dyreng, Scott D. & Lindsey, Bradley P. & Thornock, Jacob R., 2013. "Exploring the role Delaware plays as a domestic tax haven," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 751-772.
    19. Lai, Tat-kei & Ng, Travis, 2017. "Does dividend tax impede competition for corporate charters?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 751-772.
    20. Boone, Audra & Broughman, Brian & Macias, Antonio J., 2018. "Shareholder approval thresholds in acquisitions: Evidence from tender offers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-245.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/666724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.