IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-730267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Determines Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Standards? General Equilibrium Analytical Model and Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Don Fullerton
  • Chi L. Ta

Abstract

Our analytical general equilibrium model investigates impacts of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) on electricity price, fossil-fuel use, renewable generation, and carbon emissions. Component effects include income, substitution, import, and direct policy effects. This breakdown helps explain how stricter RPS rules have ambiguous effects on renewable generation but negative effects on emissions. The model generates theorems and testable hypotheses about how these impacts depend on state characteristics like availability of renewable sources that are intermittent (sun, wind) or dispatchable (hydro, geothermal, biomass). We use state-level panel data from 1990 to 2015 to test these hypotheses. Our theorems and empirical tests provide most support for two hypotheses about states with stricter RPS requirements. First, having more dispatchable renewable potential is associated negatively with electricity prices and positively with fossil fuel use, emissions, and use of intermittent renewables. Second, having more wind intermittency is negatively associated with fossil fuel use and emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Don Fullerton & Chi L. Ta, 2025. "What Determines Effectiveness of Renewable Energy Standards? General Equilibrium Analytical Model and Empirical Analysis," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(1), pages 65-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/730267
    DOI: 10.1086/730267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730267
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/730267
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/730267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/730267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.