IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-727370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Financial Markets Respond to Green Opportunities?

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Kruse
  • Myra Mohnen
  • Misato Sato

Abstract

This study investigates whether financial markets respond to firms’ climate actions. We exploit the signing of the Paris Agreement, which required governments to commit to ambitious climate action, as a quasi-natural experiment. Using a proprietary green revenue database, we find that firms deriving a significant fraction of their revenues from green goods and services experience on average a 10% increase in cumulative abnormal returns following the agreement. The empirical evidence indicates that financial markets are responding to opportunities associated with new green markets, and strengthening climate policies can reallocate capital to support green private sector investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Kruse & Myra Mohnen & Misato Sato, 2024. "Do Financial Markets Respond to Green Opportunities?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(3), pages 549-576.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/727370
    DOI: 10.1086/727370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727370
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727370
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/727370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James W. Kolari & Seppo Pynnönen, 2010. "Event Study Testing with Cross-sectional Correlation of Abnormal Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(11), pages 3996-4025, November.
    2. Corrado, Charles J., 1989. "A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 385-395, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Misato Sato & Glen Gostlow & Catherine Higham & Joana Setzer & Frank Venmans, 2024. "Impacts of climate litigation on firm value," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1461-1468, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Aguzzoni & Gregor Langus & Massimo Motta, 2013. "The Effect of EU Antitrust Investigations and Fines on a Firm's Valuation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 290-338, June.
    2. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Vanessa Serrano & Francesc Prior & Jordi Cuadros, 2023. "Analysis of an event study using the Fama–French five-factor model: teaching approaches including spreadsheets and the R programming language," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    3. Mateev, Miroslav & Andonov, Kristiyan, 2018. "Do European bidders pay more in cross-border than in domestic acquisitions? New evidence from Continental Europe and the UK," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 529-556.
    4. Andrea Schertler & Jarmo Beurden, 2023. "How relative competitive strength moderates stock price responses after European soccer tournaments," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(8), pages 1385-1414, October.
    5. Petr Jakubik & Saida Teleu, 2024. "Do insurance stress tests matter? Evidence from the EU-wide insurance stress tests," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Seppo Pynnonen, 2022. "Non-Parametric Statistic for Testing Cumulative Abnormal Stock Returns," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Kiesel, Florian & Ries, Jörg M. & Tielmann, Artur, 2017. "Reprint of “The impact of mergers and acquisitions on shareholders' wealth in the logistics service industry”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 261-277.
    8. Karatzas, Antonios & Daskalakis, George & Bastl, Marko & Johnson, Mark, 2022. "Risky business? Shareholder value effects of service provision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Barbaglia, Luca & Bellia, Mario & Di Girolamo, Francesca & Rho, Caterina, 2024. "Crypto news and policy innovations: Are European markets affected?," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2024-07, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    10. Matteo Pelagatti, 2013. "Nonparametric tests for event studies under cross-sectional dependence," Working Papers 244, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2013.
    11. Ginevra Marandola & Rossella Mossucca, 2021. "When did the stock market start to react less to downgrades by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-45, February.
    12. Thai-Ha Le & Donghyun Park & Cong-Phu-Khanh Tran & Binh Tran-Nam, 2018. "The Impact of the Hai Yang Shi You 981 Event on Vietnam’s Stock Markets," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 344-375, December.
    13. Greene, Daniel & Intintoli, Vincent J. & Kahle, Kathleen M., 2020. "Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California Senate Bill No. 826," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Friedrich, Christian & Quick, Reiner, 2024. "Do non-audit service failures impair auditor reputation? An analysis of KPMG advisory service scandals in Germany," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Lehmann, Sibylle H. & Hauber, Philipp & Opitz, Alexander, 2012. "Political rights, taxation, and firm valuation: Evidence from Saxony around 1900," FZID Discussion Papers 59-2012, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    16. Xiao, Lu & Xu, Xiaolin & Xue, Weili, 2024. "Blockchain mania without bitcoins: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    17. Alexis Cellier & Pierre Chollet & Jean†François Gajewski, 2016. "Do Investors Trade around Social Rating Announcements?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(3), pages 484-515, June.
    18. Panayiotis C. Andreou & Christodoulos Louca & Christos S. Savva, 2016. "Short-horizon event study estimation with a STAR model and real contaminated events," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 673-697, October.
    19. Agbodji Amavi S. S. & Emmanuelle Nys & Alain Sauviat, 2021. "Do CDS Maturities Matter in the Evaluation of the Information Content of Regulatory Banking Stress Tests? Evidence from European and US Stress Tests," Post-Print hal-04715097, HAL.
    20. Sabet, Amir H. & Heaney, Richard, 2016. "An event study analysis of oil and gas firm acreage and reserve acquisitions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 215-227.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/727370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.