IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-726156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Cost of Groundwater Depletion in the High Plains Aquifer

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Perez-Quesada
  • Nathan P. Hendricks
  • David R. Steward

Abstract

Depletion of groundwater stocks reduces both the flow of economic value and production of goods from this resource. One challenge in estimating the economic value of the stock of groundwater is that feedback effects from irrigation behavior affect resource conditions, which creates an endogeneity concern. This study estimates how changes in groundwater stocks affect the returns to agricultural land in the High Plains aquifer. We avoid bias from feedback effects by exploiting hydrologic variation in predevelopment saturated thickness. Simulation results reveal that the average annual present value of returns to land are expected to decrease in the High Plains region by $126.7 million in 2050 and by $266.0 million in 2100. When the initial saturated thickness is less than 70 feet, most of the economic impact (67%) of a decrease in the stock of groundwater occurs through an adjustment in irrigated acreage while 33% occurs through reduced irrigated rental rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Perez-Quesada & Nathan P. Hendricks & David R. Steward, 2024. "The Economic Cost of Groundwater Depletion in the High Plains Aquifer," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(2), pages 253-285.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/726156
    DOI: 10.1086/726156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726156
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/726156
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/726156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/726156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.