IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-725700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Input Efficiency as a Solution to Externalities and Resource Scarcity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Alpizar
  • María Bernedo Del Carpio
  • Paul J. Ferraro

Abstract

Resource-conserving technologies are widely reported to benefit both the people who adopt them and the environment. Evidence for these “win-win” claims comes largely from modeling or nonexperimental designs and mostly from the energy sector. In a randomized trial of water-efficient technologies, the ex ante engineering estimate of water use reductions was three times higher than the experimental estimate, a divergence arising from engineering and behavioral reasons other than the rebound effect. Using detailed cost information and experimentally elicited time and risk preferences, we infer that the private welfare gains from adoption are, on average, negative, implying no “efficiency paradox.”

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Alpizar & María Bernedo Del Carpio & Paul J. Ferraro, 2024. "Input Efficiency as a Solution to Externalities and Resource Scarcity: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(1), pages 171-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/725700
    DOI: 10.1086/725700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725700
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725700
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/725700?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/725700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.