IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-723495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ambiguity of Fishing for Fun

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Holzer
  • Kenneth McConnell

Abstract

Recreational fishing is among the most popular outdoor recreational activities in the world. However, uncertainty in angler response to changes in regulation has limited managers’ ability to prevent overfishing. We need to understand the heuristics anglers use to overcome informational and cognitive constraints that may limit their ability to assess stochastic attributes such as catch and environmental amenities. Using data from choice experiments, we specify and estimate preferences that rely on the theory of decision under unknown risks or ambiguity. We build on the observation that anglers interpret possession limits as targets or signals on stock productivity that anchor their expectations on retained catch, to specify a multiple prior model that relies on less onerous assumptions on anglers’ information and numeracy than conventional demand models. We integrate the economic submodel into a bioeconomic model to show that our specification provides better out-of-sample predictions than linear and CARA utility models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Holzer & Kenneth McConnell, 2023. "The Ambiguity of Fishing for Fun," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 865-901.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/723495
    DOI: 10.1086/723495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723495
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723495
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/723495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/723495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.