IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/eipoec/doi10.1086-719250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing the Innovation Gap in Pink and Black

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa D. Cook
  • Janet Gerson
  • Jennifer Kuan

Abstract

Recent research shows the negative impact of discrimination not only on the targets of discrimination but also on the economy as a whole. Racial and gender inequality can limit the entire economy’s productive capacity and innovation outcomes. Using new data from the National Science Foundation’s Survey of Earned Doctorates on the scientific workforce from 1980 to 2019, as well as patenting and commercialization data, we examine racial and gender disparities at each stage of the innovation process: education and training, the practice of invention, and commercialization. Although improving along certain dimensions over time, we find persistent racial and gender disparities consistent with the current literature. To reverse the negative effects on productive capacity and long-run economic growth, we also discuss the literature on mitigating discriminatory practices at each juncture, which could have significant distributional effects as access to good jobs expands.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa D. Cook & Janet Gerson & Jennifer Kuan, 2022. "Closing the Innovation Gap in Pink and Black," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 43-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/719250
    DOI: 10.1086/719250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719250
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719250
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/719250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:eipoec:doi:10.1086/719250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EIPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.