IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-731589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relaxing Credit and Information Constraints: Five-Year Experimental Evidence from Tanzanian Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrazzak Tamim
  • Aurélie P. Harou
  • Marshall Burke
  • David Lobell
  • Malgosia Madajewicz
  • Christopher Magomba
  • Hope Michelson
  • Cheryl A. Palm
  • Jiani Xue

Abstract

Low fertilizer use by smallholder farmers continues to limit crop yields in sub-Saharan Africa. We study the longer-term outcomes of a field experiment conducted between 2014 and 2016, which found that plot-specific fertilizer recommendations combined with a subsidy increased fertilizer use and maize yields. We return in 2019 and find that effects dissipate after the subsidy is discontinued. Our follow-up results suggest that credit constraints strongly limit investment in fertilizer, because farmers have received information about what fertilizer types and amounts to apply and have an experience of fertilizer as profitable. We find that the 2016 treatment effects were driven by the most productive farmers—those with more fertile soils who cultivated larger plots of land. Our analysis features use of both self-reported and satellite-derived yield estimates. Our results suggest the potential importance of sustained financial support in combination with information to induce smallholder farmers to continue to invest in fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrazzak Tamim & Aurélie P. Harou & Marshall Burke & David Lobell & Malgosia Madajewicz & Christopher Magomba & Hope Michelson & Cheryl A. Palm & Jiani Xue, 2025. "Relaxing Credit and Information Constraints: Five-Year Experimental Evidence from Tanzanian Agriculture," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(3), pages 1409-1437.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/731589
    DOI: 10.1086/731589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731589
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731589
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/731589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/731589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.