IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-729539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Aid Buy Foreign Public Support? Evidence from Chinese Development Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Wellner
  • Axel Dreher
  • Andreas Fuchs
  • Bradley C. Parks
  • Austin Strange

Abstract

Bilateral donors use foreign aid to pursue soft power. We test the effectiveness of aid in reaching this goal by leveraging a new dataset on the precise commitment, start, and end dates of Chinese development projects. We use data from the Gallup World Poll for 126 countries over the 2006–17 period and identify causal effects by (i) an event-study model that includes high-dimensional fixed effects and (ii) instrumental variables regressions that rely on exogenous variation in the supply of Chinese government financing over time. Our results show that the completion of Chinese development projects increases popular support for the Chinese government in recipient countries. In the short run, this effect increases with the size of the project and the generosity of the financial commitment; in the longer run, it is lower among people who live in close proximity to completed Chinese development projects. In our analysis of the effect of Chinese projects on global perceptions, we find that Chinese development projects create a more favorable public opinion environment for China among countries in Africa, potential “swing states” in the United Nations General Assembly, and countries that have higher baseline (ex ante) levels of public support for the Chinese government.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Wellner & Axel Dreher & Andreas Fuchs & Bradley C. Parks & Austin Strange, 2025. "Can Aid Buy Foreign Public Support? Evidence from Chinese Development Finance," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(2), pages 523-578.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/729539
    DOI: 10.1086/729539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729539
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729539
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/729539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/729539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.