IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-729062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Better Parental Education Improve Child Health Outcomes? Evidence from the Compulsory Schooling Law in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwei Huang

Abstract

This study examines how parental education levels in China affect child health outcomes by using implementation of the Compulsory Schooling Law (CSL) to construct an instrumental variable for parental education. My first observation was that better parental education increases the incidence of a child being obese, with paternal education having a greater impact than maternal education. Second, I found that better maternal education improves child health status and reduces the incidence of a child being wasted. The exploration of potential mechanisms indicates that better education of both parents increases family income and chances of positive assortative mating; better paternal education increases grandparental care; and better maternal education increases mothers’ own health status. The results confirm a causal effect of parental education on child health outcomes, indicate that previous studies underestimate the role that fathers play in a family, and suggest the need for improvement in child-rearing methods and the conception of a healthy lifestyle.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwei Huang, 2025. "Does Better Parental Education Improve Child Health Outcomes? Evidence from the Compulsory Schooling Law in China," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(2), pages 835-873.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/729062
    DOI: 10.1086/729062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729062
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729062
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/729062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/729062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.