IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/amjhec/v5y2019i2p227-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Responses to Price Transparency Alone versus Price Transparency Combined with Reference Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Whaley

    (RAND Corporation, Berkeley Center for Health Technology, and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley)

  • Timothy Brown

    (Berkeley Center for Health Technology and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley)

  • James Robinson

    (Berkeley Center for Health Technology and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

Efforts to spur patient price shopping by providing access to price transparency tools have been met with limited success. One potential reason is the absence of financial incentives. This paper uses data from a large employer that implemented a price transparency platform and subsequently implemented a reference pricing program for laboratory and diagnostic imaging tests. We find no price shopping effects when the price transparency tool is offered alone. However, combining price transparency with reference pricing leads to significant shifts in consumer choice of facility, resulting in a 27 percent reduction in the average price paid per laboratory test and a 13 percent reduction in price paid per imaging test. A variety of public and purchaser initiatives have sought to further the development and adoption of price transparency tools. Our results imply that these tools will capture the attention of consumers, and influence their behavior, only if patients have strong financial incentives to care about prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Whaley & Timothy Brown & James Robinson, 2019. "Consumer Responses to Price Transparency Alone versus Price Transparency Combined with Reference Pricing," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 227-249, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:227-249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1162/ajhe_a_00118
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Angela & Prang, Khic-Houy & Devlin, Nancy & Scott, Anthony & Kelaher, Margaret, 2020. "The impact of price transparency on consumers and providers: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 819-825.
    2. Jinyang Chen & Chaoqun Wang, 2023. "“The reputation premium”: does hospital ranking improvement lead to a higher healthcare spending?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(5), pages 817-830, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    price transparency; reference pricing; price variation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:227-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJHE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.