IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v24y2024i4p666-686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing differences in construct from differences in response style: gsem for item response theory models with anchoring vignettes

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Pickles

    (King’s College London)

  • Matt Bluett-Duncan

    (University of Manchester)

  • Helen Sharp

    (University of Liverpool)

  • Silia Vitoratou

    (King’s College London)

Abstract

Item response theory models allow estimation of participant and group-mean trait scores from responses to a set of items, but estimates can be biased when participants vary in their response style. We illustrate models fit in gsem that can account for such response style differences by comparing self-report with their ratings of anchoring vignettes—descriptions of other individuals displaying different levels of the trait. Simulation results from standard item response the- ory, mean bias, random bias, and free-threshold models are illustrated. We show that unbiased estimates can be recovered when the vignettes rated depend on the participants’ own self-rating or are even rated by a different sample, substantially broadening their scope of application.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Pickles & Matt Bluett-Duncan & Helen Sharp & Silia Vitoratou, 2024. "Distinguishing differences in construct from differences in response style: gsem for item response theory models with anchoring vignettes," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 24(4), pages 666-686, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:24:y:2024:i:4:p:666-686
    DOI: 10.1177/1536867X241297920
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj24-4/st0760/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0760
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1536867X241297920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:24:y:2024:i:4:p:666-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.