IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v19y2019i3p523-550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Xu

    (Virginia Tech)

  • Kenneth A. Frank

    (Michigan State University)

  • Spiro J. Maroulis

    (Arizona State University)

  • Joshua M. Rosenberg

    (University of Tennessee)

Abstract

Statistical methods that quantify the discourse about causal inferences in terms of possible sources of biases are becoming increasingly impor- tant to many social-science fields such as public policy, sociology, and education. These methods are also known as “robustness or sensitivity analyses”. A series of recent works (Frank [2000, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 147–194]; Pan and Frank [2003, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 28: 315– 337]; Frank and Min [2007, Sociological Methodology 37: 349–392]; and Frank et al. [2013, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35: 437–460]) on robust- ness analysis extends earlier methods. We implement these recent developments in Stata. In particular, we provide commands to quantify the percent bias nec- essary to invalidate an inference from a Rubin causal model framework and the robustness of causal inferences in terms of correlations associated with unobserved variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Xu & Kenneth A. Frank & Spiro J. Maroulis & Joshua M. Rosenberg, 2019. "konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(3), pages 523-550, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:523-550
    DOI: 10.1177/1536867X19874223
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj19-3/st0565/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0565
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1536867X19874223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:523-550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.