IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v16y2016i3p678-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Versatile tests for comparing survival curves based on weighted log-rank statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore G. Karrison

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

The log-rank test is perhaps the most commonly used nonparametric method for comparing two survival curves and yields maximum power under proportional hazards alternatives. While the assumption of proportional hazards is often reasonable, it need not hold. Several authors have therefore developed versa- tile tests using combinations of weighted log-rank statistics that are more sensitive to nonproportional hazards. Fleming and Harrington (1991, Counting Processes and Survival Analysis, Wiley) consider the family of Gρ statistics and their supre-mum versions, while Lee (1996, Biometrics 52: 721–725) and Lee (2007, Compu- tational Statistics and Data Analysis 51: 6557–6564) propose tests based on the more extended Gρ,γ family. In this article, I consider Zm = max(|Z1 |, |Z2 |, |Z3 |), where Z1 , Z2 , and Z3 are z statistics obtained from G0,0 , G1,0 , and G0,1 tests, respectively. G0,0 corresponds to the log-rank test, while G1,0 and G0,1 are more sensitive to early and late-difference alternatives. I conduct a simulation study to compare the performance of Zm with the log-rank test, the more optimally weighted test, and Lee’s (2007) tests, under the null hypothesis, proportional hazards, early difference, and late-difference alternatives. Results indicate that the method based on Zm maintains the type I error rate, provides increased power relative to the log-rank test under early difference and late-difference alternatives, and entails only a small to moderate power loss compared with the more optimally chosen test. I apply the procedure to two datasets reported in the literature, both of which exhibit nonproportional hazards. Versatile tests such as Zm may be useful in clinical trial settings where there is concern that the treatment effect may not conform to the proportional hazards assumption. I also describe the syntax for a Stata command, verswlr, to implement the method. Copyright 2016 by StataCorp LP.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore G. Karrison, 2016. "Versatile tests for comparing survival curves based on weighted log-rank statistics," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(3), pages 678-690, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:678-690
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj16-3/st0449/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0449
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José L Jiménez & Julia Niewczas & Alexander Bore & Carl-Fredrik Burman, 2021. "A modified weighted log-rank test for confirmatory trials with a high proportion of treatment switching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Kaihuan Qian & Xiaohua Zhou, 2022. "Weighted Log-Rank Test for Clinical Trials with Delayed Treatment Effect Based on a Novel Hazard Function Family," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Marc Buyse & Everardo D. Saad & Tomasz Burzykowski & Julien Péron, 2020. "Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-oncology," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 83-103, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:678-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.