IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v72y1990i1p63-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of the U.S. MFA on Small Exporters

Author

Listed:
  • Dean, Judith M

Abstract

This paper tests two hypotheses regarding the impact of the U.S. Multifiber Arrangement restrictions on developing countries' exports of textiles and clothing to the United States: that the Multifibre Arrangement is a binding constraint on exporters; and that the arrangement encourages the growth of smaller exporters by restricting exports from major sellers. Pooled data on eight small Asian exporters over the period 1975-84 is used. Results strongly support the hypothesis that the Multifibre Arrangement has been a binding constraint. Although the arrangement appears to have diverted demand toward these smaller sellers, this effect is counteracted by slow growth in their own restraints. Copyright 1990 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean, Judith M, 1990. "The Effects of the U.S. MFA on Small Exporters," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(1), pages 63-69, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:72:y:1990:i:1:p:63-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%28199002%2972%3A1%3C63%3ATEOTUM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mausumi Kar, 2012. "National and Global Aspects of India’s Textiles and Apparel Industry and Trade: An Overview," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 1(1), pages 81-133, June.
    2. Panagariya, Arvind & Shah, Shekhar & Mishra, Deepak, 2001. "Demand elasticities in international trade: are they really low?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 313-342, April.
    3. Yanagishima, Koji & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Distorted U.S. Cotton Export Demand Under Textile Import Control," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321378, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Conway, Patrick, 2009. "Trade liberalization in textiles: Policy effects in an import-competing industry," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 664-680, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:72:y:1990:i:1:p:63-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.