IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v106y2024i5p1381-1392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Biases among Producers: Experimental Evidence of Anchoring in Procurement Auctions

Author

Listed:
  • Paul J. Ferraro

    (Carey Business School and Johns Hopkins University)

  • Kent D. Messer

    (University of Delaware)

  • Pallavi Shukla

    (Deakin University)

  • Collin Weigel

    (California Air Resources Board)

Abstract

Experimental research in behavioral economics focuses on consumer behaviors. Similar experimental research on profit-maximizing producers is rare. In three field experiments involving commercial agricultural producers in the United States, we detect evidence of anchoring in competitive auctions for conservation contracts related to nutrient and pest management that were worth, on average, nearly $9,000. In these auctions, the value of the starting cost-share bid was randomized to be either 0% or 100%. When the starting value was 100%, final bids were 46% higher, on average. We find weak evidence that experience with conservation contracts may modestly attenuate the anchoring effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul J. Ferraro & Kent D. Messer & Pallavi Shukla & Collin Weigel, 2024. "Behavioral Biases among Producers: Experimental Evidence of Anchoring in Procurement Auctions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(5), pages 1381-1392, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1381-1392
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01215
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_01215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1381-1392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.