IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v106y2024i5p1352-1368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Skeptical Employers: Experimental Evidence on Biased Beliefs Constraining Firm Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano A. Caria

    (University of Warwick)

  • Paolo Falco

    (University of Copenhagen)

Abstract

Does low trust in workers discourage firms from hiring? We conduct an experiment in Ghana with real entrepreneurs who have the option to hire anonymous workers for a trivial but tedious task. Shirking attracts no penalty and completion of the task is an indicator of trustworthiness. We elicit employers’ expectations and study how they change with random signals of workers’ previous behavior. We find that employers underestimate workers’ trustworthiness, which reduces hiring and profits. Negative signals lower employers’ expectations, while positive signals do not affect them. This asymmetry can help to sustain an equilibrium with limited experimentation and biased beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano A. Caria & Paolo Falco, 2024. "Skeptical Employers: Experimental Evidence on Biased Beliefs Constraining Firm Growth," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(5), pages 1352-1368, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1352-1368
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_01219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01219
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_01219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1352-1368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.