IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v8y2008i3p51-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsibility in Uncertain Times: An Institutional Perspective on Precaution

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Pellizzoni

    (Luigi Pellizzoni is associate professor of Sociology of the Environment at the University of Trieste, Italy. His research interests focus on risk, environment, technology and democracy. His publications include "The Myth of the Best Argument. Power, Deliberation and Reason," British Journal of Sociology 52 (1) (2001); "Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy," Environmental Values 12 (2) (2003); "Knowledge, Uncertainty and the Transformation of the Public Sphere," European Journal of Social Theory 6 (3) (2003); and "Responsibility and Environmental Governance," Environmental Politics 13 (3) (2004).)

  • Marja Ylönen

    (Marja Ylönen is a junior lecturer in Sociology at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. She is finalizing her Ph.D. dissertation on crimes against the environment. Her publications include "Les crimes contre l'environnement en Finlande," in Les annales de la rescherche urbaine. Nro. 84/84 (1999); and "The Formation of a Power Relationship in an Environmental Conflict," in All Shades of Green. The Environmentalization of Finnish Society, edited by E. Konttinen et al. (1999).)

Abstract

Precaution is a key issue in environmental governance. Variously defined, intensively debated and introduced in many regulations, its meaning, scope and application remain problematic. This article argues that the controversy on precaution is a matter of culturally patterned expectations concerning the production and use of knowledge and the related social positions and responsibilities. The way uncertainty and its role in the policy process are understood is crucial. For some precaution is a flawed concept, to be accommodated to the current expert-based cooperative scheme. For others it is a major innovation requiring a rearrangement of the latter. Precautionary policies may evolve in different directions. They may either strengthen the role of means-ends rationality, increasing people's dependence on expert knowledge and shrinking the opportunity and scope of public debate or, on the contrary, enhance the role of value-commitments, leading to a decline in the legitimacy of established hierarchies and an intensification of intractable controversies. (c) 2008 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Pellizzoni & Marja Ylönen, 2008. "Responsibility in Uncertain Times: An Institutional Perspective on Precaution," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(3), pages 51-73, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:8:y:2008:i:3:p:51-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.51
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. JesseL. Reynolds, 2020. "Governing New Biotechnologies for Biodiversity Conservation: GeneDrives, International Law, and Emerging Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(3), pages 28-48, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:8:y:2008:i:3:p:51-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.