IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v24y2024i4p10-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise of Sustainability Provisions in International Investment Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Dotzauer
  • Lisa Biber-Freudenberger
  • Thomas Dietz

Abstract

There is a lively debate about whether international investment agreements (IIAs)—the central instruments governing foreign direct investment—are compatible with sustainable development objectives. One critical argument is that investment treaty provisions limit governments' policy space to achieve transitions toward sustainability and may lead to costly legal disputes. Against this background, governments, international organizations, and other stakeholders have begun to consider options for modernizing international investment law by including provisions related to sustainable development in the treaties. In this article, we examine to what extent and why states include sustainability references in IIAs. Our automated text analysis of 2,083 bilateral investment treaties and 374 other treaties with investment provisions shows that the number of sustainability references has risen sharply recently. Drawing on the literature on issue linkage in economic agreements, we test different explanations for the changes in the treaty language. We find that the level of democracy among treaty parties and the experience of being sued in the past are strong drivers of the described trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Dotzauer & Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Thomas Dietz, 2024. "The Rise of Sustainability Provisions in International Investment Agreements," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 24(4), pages 10-36, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:4:p:10-36
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00759
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:4:p:10-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.