IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v24y2024i3p48-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Polycentric Engagement Relate to Countries' NDC Ambition and Mitigation Policy Effort?

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Castro
  • Marlene Kammerer
  • Axel Michaelowa

Abstract

Under the Paris Agreement, global climate governance has become decidedly more polycentric. However, it is still debated whether the turn toward greater polycentricity leads to more effectiveness in delivering public goods like climate change mitigation. This article argues that engagement in polycentric climate governance is linked to both more ambitious mitigation targets and stronger mitigation policy effort at the national level. Empirically, we analyze the extent to which countries' mitigation ambition and policy effort are associated with state-level memberships in transnational climate governance initiatives and with sub- and nonstate actors' memberships, while controlling for other potential explanations. We find that while polycentric engagement is not associated with higher ambition of countries' mitigation targets, it does correlate with greater policy effort. This is particularly the case for former non–Annex I countries, that is, countries without mitigation commitments under the old Kyoto regime. We explain these synergies with a discussion of polycentric systems' contribution to supporting knowledge exchange and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Castro & Marlene Kammerer & Axel Michaelowa, 2024. "How Does Polycentric Engagement Relate to Countries' NDC Ambition and Mitigation Policy Effort?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 24(3), pages 48-74, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:48-74
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00751
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:48-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.