IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v24y2024i2p98-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert Authority Politics in the Marine Biodiversity Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Langlet
  • Alice Vadrot

Abstract

The negotiations for a new instrument for the conservation and sustainable use of high-seas marine biodiversity (marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction; BBNJ) finally concluded after difficult negotiations. The BBNJ negotiations had to address a regime complex of sectoral and regional organizations regulating different aspects of marine biodiversity and a political struggle about the epistemologies that ought to inform marine biodiversity governance, which is driven by limited, unequally distributed, and contested knowledge. However, to be implemented, the new BBNJ Agreement will have to be equipped with expert authority to be able to address these challenges and make competent statements about the state of high-seas marine biodiversity. We address a gap in empirical work on expert authority in the regime complex by analyzing state references to the expertise of different international organizations in the BBNJ negotiations. Combining collaborative event ethnography and social network analysis, we show that states strategically and politically refer to the expertise of international organizations, and we coin the term authority shopping to describe this behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Langlet & Alice Vadrot, 2024. "Expert Authority Politics in the Marine Biodiversity Complex," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 24(2), pages 98-121, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:2:p:98-121
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00744
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:24:y:2024:i:2:p:98-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.